Advertisement
45 posts in this thread / 0 new
Last post

Pages

CBD | 17-23 Wills St | Wills Place |116m | 35L | Residential

Melburn21's picture
#1

Back to top
Peter Maltezos's picture

Architects: Karvellaris Urban Design

A 1930's Moderne (Artdeco) building covers the entire site and has been retained and integrated with the new building.

The new tower will be inserted within the envelope of the existing Moderne building and will sit on large columns that penetrate through and beyond the existing building thus creating a separation between the old and new.

The four level void 30 levels high in the sky will provide sporting/recreational programs that are associated with urban living and will offer views of the city from a vantage point not often found with such spaces.

I last heard that the developers of this building were planning to use mirors called heliostats to reflect light into the void (light shaft) between the existing Wills Court apartments and their proposal.

I believe this proposal is still at the planning stage, not yet approved.

I collect, therefore I am.
thecollectormm.com.au

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

new design

images © Kavellaris Urban Design

existing facade changes

ground

L2

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

I like it. It's bold, daring, and offers something different to what we're used to.

Back to top
Melbourne_Fragments's picture

tower look alright, but they just HAD to add some generic bold colour feature things to overwhelm the Art Deco facade didnt they?

Back to top
Dangerous Beans's picture

I like the colour on the tower, it's welcome in the sea of grey that exists in that area. Agree that the red shroud they are proposing to add to the entrance of the Art Dec building is neither necessary or appropriate.

Back to top
Michael Berquez's picture

I love it...

Back to top
Kycon's picture

Looks like the north facing facade of A'beckett tower...but horribly wrong. Even Brady's job across the street are better then this.

Back to top
Andrew Mck's picture

The unique roof park is gone.
That was the best thing about this.

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

approved

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

I hope the colours stay true to the render.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Site for sale with permit.

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture

ITs OK design wise, but the renders downplay how close much of it is to other buildings - again the setbacks for apartments all round are pretty minimal. The (unofficial) minimum is 10m, but here, while the apartments in Wills Court get a 6m gap for light instead of a light shaft, if there are apartments facing only the side or rear lane of the actual site, they only get about the same ! (the plans show a 12 storey building to the only undeveloped site to the west, but CofM says its 22 storeys.)

So the new minimum is 6m ? How much light will any of those apartments get, especially ones facing south ? Barely enough to read by I would think, but who actualy knows ? We need some reasonable standards.

ps are there plans of the actual apartment layout ?

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

VCAT considered the issues you have raised in great detail before approving the latest design:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2013/2094.h...

Back to top
Adam Ford's picture

I'm sorry, but all that concrete when you could have had glass on all sides is just a cheap waste.

Back to top
Andrew's picture

Don't worry, if the site is being sold it'll probably be redesigned now.

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture

Well both VCAT decisions discuss the setback on the north side in great detail, and the second one concludes that 6m is reasonably given 'development equity' and the size of the site. (and that the north wall of the new tower should be painted white).

Neither of them examine the separation between towers on the south side (6.1m) or the west side (9m) and whether this is enough to adequately light apartments that look only onto those gaps, or indeed disadvantage the apartments at the rear of 350 or 360 (under construction). So I guess 6m is the new minimum, at least when 'development equity' is the overriding consideration.

They both note that the current guidelines recommend 25m (!!) unless habitable room do not face each other.....

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top
johnproctor's picture

If 6m was applied on both sites the minimum would be 12m but someone years ago approved and built wills tower on the adjoining site with no setback... Equity relates to not completely screwing this site because of he mistake of the past.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Sales on this project will start soon. Latest render:

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture

Isn't the site still for sale?

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Sorry, yes site is for sale not the apartments.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture
Back to top
3000's picture

Lovely outcome.

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture

Display suite i think:

Back to top
3000's picture

I really want this built.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Display centre open this Saturday.

Glassified:

Back to top

Pages

Development & Planning

Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - 07:00
Another of the squadron of tall residential towers dotting the CBD's northern expanses has topped out. Empire Melbourne is a predominantly precast monolith highlighted by vertical gold fins set at different angles. Head contractor Probuild last week took Empire Melbourne to its high point, topping out the tower with the final level completed.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Friday, May 19, 2017 - 00:00
Rachel Ong , Curtin University ; Christopher Phelps , Curtin University ; Gavin Wood , RMIT University , and Steven Rowley , Curtin University Australia’s capital cities are getting more and more units, that are largely concentrated and come with a hefty price tag, a new report shows .

Advertisement

Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 - 07:00
Once again Melbourne has turned it on for the spectacular cultural juggernaut that is White Night. A crowd of around 600,000 took part in the all night festival of projections, performances, artworks and installations. Stealing the show again this year was the extraordinary projections upon the Royal Exhibition Building.

Transport & Design

Friday, May 26, 2017 - 00:00
On Wednesday next week, RMIT's Centre for Urban Research is holding its third monthly Talking Transport event: The Melbourne Airport Rail Link, are we there yet? It is a free, ticketed event , to be held at RMIT's Building 80 - located at 445 Swanston Street - level 11, room 10 from 6:00 pm.

Sustainability & Environment

Wednesday, May 24, 2017 - 12:00
Over the course of the last week OSK Property has released images of a new Southbank park within its Melbourne Square development. The large public park will occupy more than 20 per cent of overall site and will be one of the first stages of the project to be delivered.