Advertisement
198 posts in this thread / 0 new
Last post

Pages

MELBOURNE | 600 Collins Street | 54L | 186m | Mixed Use

Ryan Seychell's picture
#1

 

May as well make a thread for this one:

Site sold recently, AFR article: http://www.afr.com/real-estate/henkell-syndicate-cashes-in-on-collins-20...

Development includes:

- 70 level mixed use tower

- 1100 apartments

- $1 billion

- Planned completion, 2021

Back to top
Alastair Taylor's picture
Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

Looks very Bates Smart, based on one cropped render of course

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture

Has a hint of the original Queensbridge Tower design about it...

Back to top
Laurence Dragomir's picture

I'd be inclined to say Bates Smart as well.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

that would do it

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Looks good, although won't it almost certainly be cut down to prevent overshadowing?

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Probably end up 217m to stay under OLS.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Why are they even bothering lodging at ~220m-240m?

Back to top
Andrew's picture

Two Auroras for Melbourne? Sign me up.

Back to top
Laurence Dragomir's picture

Zaha Hadid involved in a different scheme.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Chopped down to around 180m I believe thanks to the new policies.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

They just didn't get the application in on time :-(

Back to top
Laurence Dragomir's picture

Plot ratio was looking like 32:1.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

It would be limited to 180m because of the overshadowing requirements.

It is a 2400 square metre site so the maximum floorspace can be 57,600.
A 10 level podium covering the entire site = 24,000sqm leaving 33,600sqm of floorspace for the tower above or 46 levels with an average floor area of 730 square metres.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

They should hold off until final policies are announced next year.

Massive waste of a site otherwise.

Back to top
db2's picture

The site would be excellent for an office tower instead of another residential.

Back to top
Ryan Seychell's picture

Considering 568 is next door to this and already 224m, i'd be happy with 180m to create some height variation. Also, Zaha Hadid design > height.

Back to top
db2's picture

Ah, I missed that part. New Zaha Hadid 180m design?

That should be very interesting indeed.

We have 249m Premier Tower and 270m Ritz Carlton nearby for height; so yes, a shrink but nicer design will be a good outcome.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Still, if they wait a bit longer it could mean we end up with a Zaha Hadid building AND something slightly higher.

Back to top
db2's picture

I doubt Wynnie will change his Yarra overshadowing rules in the new rules come next September.

I don't think higher is viable on this site until a change in planning minister, 3 or 7 years from now.

Back to top
Andrew Mck's picture

I bet the Poo can't wait to cut this one down.

Back to top
3000's picture

oh look, another height complaint.

Back to top
Michael Berquez's picture

180m there would sit well I think

Back to top
Adam Ford's picture

I love the way in which the semiotics of "stellar, supremely gifted architect" are given an equivalence with "geez it'd be awesome if it were 20m taller".

So to be clear, on a design you haven't seen, you're convinced it's going to be a better design or urban outcome or any of the actual metrics people who come here value by virtue of being 20m taller?

It's such a goddamn pity the Parthenon is so short ...

Back to top

Pages

Development & Planning

Friday, July 21, 2017 - 00:00
Last week's joint announcement by Planning Minister Richard Wynne, Premier Daniel Andrews and Lord Mayor Robert Doyle that the Amendment C245 planning controls have been adopted, paves the way for work to commence on the $250 million dollar redevelopment of the Queen Victoria Market. Concept for Munro site (subject to change).

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Friday, July 14, 2017 - 00:00
It is so much easier to knock a building down than it is to build one. Building is a long and involved process of dreaming, planning, scheming, and the wonderfully gritty bit that is actually constructing a physical manifestation of these things, while getting rid of a building sometimes takes no more than a bit of paperwork, some heavy machinery, and the stroke of a pen.

Advertisement

Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 - 07:00
Once again Melbourne has turned it on for the spectacular cultural juggernaut that is White Night. A crowd of around 600,000 took part in the all night festival of projections, performances, artworks and installations. Stealing the show again this year was the extraordinary projections upon the Royal Exhibition Building.

Transport & Design

Tuesday, July 18, 2017 - 13:00
Little by little we're getting closer to the money and shovels-in-the-ground end of the Melbourne Metro Tunnel project with the announcement that the Cross Yarra Partnership is the successful bidder for the Tunnel & Stations availability-based private-public partnership (PPP) contract.

Sustainability & Environment

Thursday, July 20, 2017 - 12:00
The greening of Southbank is a step closer to reality following the endorsement of the draft concept plan for Southbank Boulevard and Dodds Street by the Future Melbourne Committee on Tuesday, 18 July, 2017.