Advertisement
28 posts in this thread / 0 new
Last post

Pages

SOUTHBANK | 71-85 City Road | 67L | 224 metres | Residential

Mark Baljak's picture
#1

Images courtesy Doig Architecture

Back to top
Adam Ford's picture

Well bowl me over with a fishfork, they've kept the unprotected heritage building. Not the world's most sympathetic treatment, but bugger me it's there.

Back to top
Peter Maltezos's picture

^^ Interesting, very good for CE. smiley

I collect, therefore I am.
thecollectormm.com.au

Back to top
Riddlz's picture

So is this 2.4m or 1.6m for the ground level?

Shouldn't it be 226.2-1.6 so 225m rounded up.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Central Equity actually have quite a good record for retaining heritage buildings in their developments.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Entrance is 1.6 AHD so overall height above ground level is 224.6

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

umm spot on

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture

Interesting that it was presumably submitted before the recent tower rules, but complies with them, at least to the extent that the minimum setbacks on all sides are 5m. I guess this has been an informal minimum for some time. Also interesting that it looks like it's been designed with the possibility of another tower to the west, with those apartments in the middle on the west side having views directed towards the street rather than relying on views over the adjacent site.

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Just wondering as to what caused CE to deviate from their normal offering? Not that I'm complaining.

Back to top
3000's picture

Even CE have to mix it up a bit guess.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

The standard of applications in Southbank improved after the planning controls were reviewed and amended controls were introduced in June 2013. Generally nothing has recently been approved with setbacks of less than 5m from the boundaries or within 10m of another building.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Why are they showing A108 as AHD 313m?

Back to top
tiankd74's picture

I don't like central equity

Back to top
3000's picture

I think most of SB sucks tbh. Shit central.

Back to top
Dean's picture

Set back, 225m and a not bad design.

Mark or tays are we rounding up??? 224.6 = 225m???

Back to top
Riddlz's picture

MCC reccomending refusal and was cut back to 50L and 166m

Back to top
db2's picture

Good on MCC.

CE is CE, crap is crap, at 200m+ this would have been a shocker.

383 LaTrobe Street getting MCC approval is huge.

Two good decisions by the MCC.

Back to top
Sydney Struwig's picture

Good news, it would be better if they refused the entire development and sent them packing. CE are responsible for most of the warts in our city.

Connecting ideas, places and people. #ohyesmelbourne

Back to top
Riddlz's picture
Back to top
Riddlz's picture

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Has that been approved at the shorter level?

Back to top
Chris Seals's picture

What a disgrace, reminds me of a cooling tower.

Back to top
3000's picture

That's a no from me.

Back to top
SYmlb's picture

@MelbourneGuy; Doig Architects mention it as a 49 level tower on their website and the latest render is clearly around that level, plus the Sept 2016 agenda where this was proposed shows 49 levels (plus plantroom). Seems likely they approved it at that height.

The DELWP website is a real mess and very user un-friendly. It's a worry when we have to rely on renders for a floor count. The Queensland equivalent is golden compared to this archaic platform.

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Thanks SYMLB.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Another victim of Edward Scissorhands.

Back to top

Pages

Development & Planning

Monday, July 24, 2017 - 00:00
Giancorp Property Group is looking to rework their Moonee Ponds mixed-use development, refining the previously approved scheme with the help of Buchan Group as project architect. Located in a burgeoning development precinct immediately south of Puckle Street, 17-23 Puckle Street and 6-14 Young Street will see two separate buildings developed, with the taller spanning 16 levels.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Friday, July 14, 2017 - 00:00
It is so much easier to knock a building down than it is to build one. Building is a long and involved process of dreaming, planning, scheming, and the wonderfully gritty bit that is actually constructing a physical manifestation of these things, while getting rid of a building sometimes takes no more than a bit of paperwork, some heavy machinery, and the stroke of a pen.

Advertisement

Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 - 07:00
Once again Melbourne has turned it on for the spectacular cultural juggernaut that is White Night. A crowd of around 600,000 took part in the all night festival of projections, performances, artworks and installations. Stealing the show again this year was the extraordinary projections upon the Royal Exhibition Building.

Transport & Design

Tuesday, July 18, 2017 - 13:00
Little by little we're getting closer to the money and shovels-in-the-ground end of the Melbourne Metro Tunnel project with the announcement that the Cross Yarra Partnership is the successful bidder for the Tunnel & Stations availability-based private-public partnership (PPP) contract.

Sustainability & Environment

Thursday, July 20, 2017 - 12:00
The greening of Southbank is a step closer to reality following the endorsement of the draft concept plan for Southbank Boulevard and Dodds Street by the Future Melbourne Committee on Tuesday, 18 July, 2017.