Advertisement
28 posts in this thread / 0 new
Last post

Pages

SOUTHBANK | 71-85 City Road | 67L | 224 metres | Residential

Mark Baljak's picture
#1

Images courtesy Doig Architecture

Back to top
Adam Ford's picture

Well bowl me over with a fishfork, they've kept the unprotected heritage building. Not the world's most sympathetic treatment, but bugger me it's there.

Back to top
Peter Maltezos's picture

^^ Interesting, very good for CE. smiley

I collect, therefore I am.
thecollectormm.com.au

Back to top
Riddlz's picture

So is this 2.4m or 1.6m for the ground level?

Shouldn't it be 226.2-1.6 so 225m rounded up.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Central Equity actually have quite a good record for retaining heritage buildings in their developments.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

Entrance is 1.6 AHD so overall height above ground level is 224.6

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

umm spot on

Back to top
Rohan Storey's picture

Interesting that it was presumably submitted before the recent tower rules, but complies with them, at least to the extent that the minimum setbacks on all sides are 5m. I guess this has been an informal minimum for some time. Also interesting that it looks like it's been designed with the possibility of another tower to the west, with those apartments in the middle on the west side having views directed towards the street rather than relying on views over the adjacent site.

Lookingupatbuildings

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Just wondering as to what caused CE to deviate from their normal offering? Not that I'm complaining.

Back to top
3000's picture

Even CE have to mix it up a bit guess.

Back to top
Nicholas Harrison's picture

The standard of applications in Southbank improved after the planning controls were reviewed and amended controls were introduced in June 2013. Generally nothing has recently been approved with setbacks of less than 5m from the boundaries or within 10m of another building.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Why are they showing A108 as AHD 313m?

Back to top
tiankd74's picture

I don't like central equity

Back to top
3000's picture

I think most of SB sucks tbh. Shit central.

Back to top
Dean's picture

Set back, 225m and a not bad design.

Mark or tays are we rounding up??? 224.6 = 225m???

Back to top
Riddlz's picture

MCC reccomending refusal and was cut back to 50L and 166m

Back to top
db2's picture

Good on MCC.

CE is CE, crap is crap, at 200m+ this would have been a shocker.

383 LaTrobe Street getting MCC approval is huge.

Two good decisions by the MCC.

Back to top
Sydney Struwig's picture

Good news, it would be better if they refused the entire development and sent them packing. CE are responsible for most of the warts in our city.

Connecting ideas, places and people. #ohyesmelbourne

Back to top
Riddlz's picture
Back to top
Riddlz's picture

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Has that been approved at the shorter level?

Back to top
Chris Seals's picture

What a disgrace, reminds me of a cooling tower.

Back to top
3000's picture

That's a no from me.

Back to top
SYmlb's picture

@MelbourneGuy; Doig Architects mention it as a 49 level tower on their website and the latest render is clearly around that level, plus the Sept 2016 agenda where this was proposed shows 49 levels (plus plantroom). Seems likely they approved it at that height.

The DELWP website is a real mess and very user un-friendly. It's a worry when we have to rely on renders for a floor count. The Queensland equivalent is golden compared to this archaic platform.

Back to top
MelbourneGuy's picture

Thanks SYMLB.

Back to top
Qantas743's picture

Another victim of Edward Scissorhands.

Back to top

Pages

Development & Planning

Tuesday, May 30, 2017 - 07:00
Another of the squadron of tall residential towers dotting the CBD's northern expanses has topped out. Empire Melbourne is a predominantly precast monolith highlighted by vertical gold fins set at different angles. Head contractor Probuild last week took Empire Melbourne to its high point, topping out the tower with the final level completed.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Friday, May 19, 2017 - 00:00
Rachel Ong , Curtin University ; Christopher Phelps , Curtin University ; Gavin Wood , RMIT University , and Steven Rowley , Curtin University Australia’s capital cities are getting more and more units, that are largely concentrated and come with a hefty price tag, a new report shows .

Advertisement

Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 - 07:00
Once again Melbourne has turned it on for the spectacular cultural juggernaut that is White Night. A crowd of around 600,000 took part in the all night festival of projections, performances, artworks and installations. Stealing the show again this year was the extraordinary projections upon the Royal Exhibition Building.

Transport & Design

Friday, May 26, 2017 - 00:00
On Wednesday next week, RMIT's Centre for Urban Research is holding its third monthly Talking Transport event: The Melbourne Airport Rail Link, are we there yet? It is a free, ticketed event , to be held at RMIT's Building 80 - located at 445 Swanston Street - level 11, room 10 from 6:00 pm.

Sustainability & Environment

Wednesday, May 24, 2017 - 12:00
Over the course of the last week OSK Property has released images of a new Southbank park within its Melbourne Square development. The large public park will occupy more than 20 per cent of overall site and will be one of the first stages of the project to be delivered.