The Napthine Government's planning tax legacy

From 1 July 2015 a new levy under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) (the Act) must be paid to the State Revenue Office in respect of all planning permit applications for developments in metropolitan Melbourne with an estimated development cost of over $1,000,000. The levy is $1.30 for every $1,000 of the estimated cost of the development.

This payment is in addition to statutory planning application fees and due to the formula used to calculate the levy it will, at a minimum, double the cost of lodging a planning permit application.

When is the Metropolitan Planning Levy (MPL) payable?

Leviable applications are:

  1. applications for a planning permit for development of land;
  2. within Metropolitan Melbourne (defined as the land falling within the Urban Growth Boundary plus some nearby areas including Yarra Ranges and Mornington Peninsula); and
  3. for an estimated cost of more than $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation from 1 July 2016).

What is the process?

  1. A planning permit application cannot be lodged with the Responsible Authority without presenting a certificate indicating that the MPL has been paid.
  2. The prospective applicant must first notify the State Revenue Office that it intends to make an application and state the estimated cost of the development.
  3. The prospective applicant must pay the MPL to the State Revenue Office. This can be done by electronic funds transfer.
  4. The Commissioner may request information in relation to the permit from the Responsible Authority to verify the estimated cost of the development.
  5. The Commissioner will issue a certificate as evidence of payment, which must be provided to the Responsible Authority with the permit application and which expires after 90 days. If within this period, but before a permit application is lodged, the estimated cost of the development increases, the prospective applicant must pay any additional levy and the Commissioner will issue a revised certificate.

Can an applicant obtain a refund of the MPL?

Only if a mathematical mistake was made. Otherwise, no refund is available, even if:

  1. the estimated cost of the development decreases after the MPL is paid;
  2. the permit application is not subsequently made, lapses, is refused or is withdrawn;
  3. the threshold amount increases between the time of the payment of the levy and the making the application, so as to make a given development application no longer leviable; or
  4. the permit is granted and is subsequently cancelled.

This means that upon refusal of a permit application, another MPL must be paid and certificate received before a second application can be lodged.

There is no right of appeal to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.


The MPL was announced in the 2014-15 State Budget and is intended to fund the ongoing development of planning policy and strategy for the Melbourne metropolitan area, including the operations of the Metropolitan Planning Authority and the implementation of Plan Melbourne. It appears to have been introduced without any consultation with the industry. Furthermore, no detailed break down of exactly what the Levy is going to fund has been released.

It is understood that the levy is not intended to penalise home owners or small developments but rather to apply to more significant development applications. However, the $1,000,000 threshold is likely to affect a significant number of developments and extend the reach and impact of the levy.

It significantly increases the statutory fees required to undertake development applications without any apparent benefits to the permit applicant. The inability to review the requirement for the MPL or seek a refund increases the costs and risks associated with permit applications for developers.

The MPL is clearly a tax on the application process. The taxation nature of the 'levy' is revealed by recognising that it was introduced by legislation entitled 'Building a Better Victoria (State Tax and Other Legislation Amendment) Act 2014'.

Other issues

It is unclear how the estimated cost of development is to be calculated. The State Revenue Office indicates that it is based on the 'construction cost', although it is not clear whether other development costs might also be included, such as engineering fees, design fees, other development levies and contingencies.

The legislation is also not clear on whether the estimated cost is to be calculated according to market rates, by reference to a reasonable cost estimate of a similar development or based on individual developers' estimated costs. The SRO has the power to request verification of an estimate and there is the potential for additional costs and delays for developers if quantity surveyor statements are required.

A further administrative burden will be placed on Councils (who incidentally take no benefit from the MPL) as they will be required to ensure that the necessary certificate has been issued before processing applications.

Finally, the additional costs may impact on the quality of the permit applications with developers seeking to save on costs in the preparation of the application materials which will create inefficiencies in the process and further costs for Council and the applicant down the track.


The lack of information how the MPL funds are going to be spent is problematic. It is unlikely that developments at the bottom end of the scale will see any benefit from MPL payments made.

There is more likely to be a nexus between very large development and MPL fund spending and in that regard it is arguable that it would be more equitable to raise the MPL trigger to a level that will ensure that the developments required to pay it will are the ones that will see some benefit from the funds raised.

James Lofting is a Senior Associate at HWL Ebsworth Lawyers in their Planning and Environment Group.

My Real Estate Mate logo

Development & Planning

Tuesday, October 25, 2016 - 00:00
Recognised as the gateway to the eastern suburbs, Box Hill has come a long way from its initial suburban identity. With a number of major urban redevelopment projects underway and many more set to define its skyline, Box Hill has become the fastest growing city centre outside of the Melbourne...

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Thursday, October 20, 2016 - 14:30
On Monday 24th of October, the iCities: World Class CBDs series conference kicks off. First held in Kuala Lumpur, this year's conference is to be held at the Langham Hotel on Southbank. iCities is owned and operated by iProperty Group, a network property under the REA Group umbrella brand. Over...


Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - 17:00
Melbourne’s architectural landscape is a wonderful juxtaposition of modern and Victorian architecture. Although the CBD has been peppered with many skyscrapers, its historical structures have won Melbourne the title of “Australia’s most European city”. Perhaps the most striking example of this juxtaposition between old and new is the Coops Shot...

Transport & Design

Thursday, October 20, 2016 - 07:00
108 Leicester Street is a collection of eight multi-level Fitzroy townhouses that have been designed to respond to the changing face of multi-residential living in Melbourne. The hybrid inner-city dwellings combine developer/builder FOURSQ with Melbourne firm BKK Architects. The design acknowledges the housing typologies of the development's Fitzroy neighbourhood with...

Sustainability & Environment

Wednesday, October 5, 2016 - 00:00
The proposed new Melbourne Conservatorium of Music (MCM) on Sturt Street is shaping to become much more than a cutting edge venue. While the project has been given coverage to date across a range of mediums, very little has been said regarding the project playing an integral part in the...