Advertisement

The cost efficiency of mid-rise timber structures

Timber mid-rise buildings are becoming the preferred choice for many stakeholders in Melbourne, due to a combination of factors, including cost-effectiveness, liveability, ease and efficiency of construction. Within the recent National Construction Code change, Deemed-To-Satisfy provisions allow mid-rise timber construction for buildings up to 25 metres “effective height” (typically, eight storeys).

The population of Melbourne is growing at the rate of 100,000 a year and maintaining the city’s reputation as one of the world’s most liveable will require urban infill, with an emphasis on less intrusive mid-rise solutions. In this sector, timber has a lot to offer: an increasing body of evidence points to the advantages timber buildings can provide to their occupants, while also offering the environmental benefits of a sustainable, renewable building material with a low carbon footprint.

However, it’s when quality and cost are taken into account that property developers become interested. Typically, the cost benefits of timber construction come from a combination of factors, including reduced preliminaries, direct material savings, easier off-site prefabrication, fewer variations and a simpler execution of follow-up trades, as demonstrated by a range of successful projects.

Most design and construction professionals in Melbourne know about Lend Lease’s Forté Living apartments (Figure 1), completed in 2012. This Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) project delivered a 30% reduction in the overall time scheduled for an equivalent concrete-based program and was erected by a crew of only four carpenters and an operator for a small remote control crane. Based on the success of Forté, Lend Lease have several similar developments currently underway in Australia and more planned globally.

Another remarkable result was achieved by Australand in 2015 with The Green (Figure 2), on the Tullamarine Freeway. This is a five-storey residential building based on traditional lightweight timber framed walls and pre-fabricated composite cassette floor elements. The Green delivered an overall saving of 25% in construction costs, compared to another building with equivalent performance specifications and finishes that Australand completed soon after.

The major difference came from preliminaries (crane, scaffolding, site storage space, etc.) due to the reduced construction time and weights of unit components.

Currently, Sydney’s Strongbuild are achieving significant time and cost efficiencies in a large CLT social housing project (Figure 3) with respect to the conditions they offered to win the tender. Having almost completed the six-storey and the seven-storey parts of the three-building, 101-apartment complex, they are already 3 months ahead of schedule, mostly because they did not have any significant variations so far.

This is a relevant feature of timber construction: even a low level of off-site prefabrication can significantly improve accuracy, resulting in easier and quicker installation sequences, with fewer delays, minimum corrections and material waste.

Engineered wood products can also provide cost-effective elements for equivalent performances in a direct comparison, as it was the case for a 140-apartment development in Milan, Italy (Figure 4) delivered in 2011. This project, which features a flexible floorplan layout, optimising the mix of dwelling typologies and building services locations, dictated a structure which was 19% cheaper to erect in timber than in concrete. It effectively opened the path to a “cultural shock” for Italian building industry, resulting in several similar projects in the following years.

Updating a feasibility study after the code change, an independent quantity surveyor (http://www.mbmpl.com.au/) conservatively calculated a benefit of 10% for light frame timber construction in comparison to concrete for the building described in Figure 5.

Cost efficiency adds to the many environmental benefits of building with timber, a sustainable, certified and fully renewable resource, allowing for high thermal efficiency and distinctive beneficial effects on acoustics and indoor air quality, as summarised in a Planet Ark report.

Timber structures are becoming the preferred choice for mid-rise residential or commercial projects worldwide, aimed at achieving environmentally focused “green ratings” while keeping cost, delivery terms and quality within specifications. Timber construction is therefore on the rise, with an 18-storey building just completed in Vancouver, Canada (Figure 6), while projects for 30, 50 and even 80 storeys (Figure 7) are being investigated through sound design partnerships, backed by innovative builders and developers.

WoodSolutions’ free advisory program, started just a few months ago, is providing inspiration, evidence of suitability and design resources to many building professionals in Victoria, with no reference to specific product brands and the only aim to disseminate technical information applicable to projects in the early stage.

Select an image below to view a larger size version in the gallery.

Figure 1: Forté Living apartments in the Docklands brought modern mid-rise timber building in Australia. Photo: WoodSolutions.

2 comments

johnproctor's picture

my question is about weight. The most significant cost of over track development is the deck that must be built to support the building above.

If wood based construction is significantly lighter would that allow a simpler structural solution for the deck and improve the economics of these in fill proposals?

Federation Square East for example is effectively 'on hold' at the moment because the economics don't stack up due to the deck. Would wooden structures help to fix that?

Back to top
Paolo Lavisci's picture

Definitely yes, timber structures will help reducing the foundation costs, as it happened in a number of cases where the soil was poor or the construction was meant to be over a subway.
Both the Forte' apartments and the Library at the Docks did benefit from it.
See another good example at http://waughthistleton.com/dalston-lane/

Paolo Lavisci

Back to top

Development & Planning

Tuesday, February 21, 2017 - 06:00
Although applications for substantially tall apartment towers have eased over recent times within City of Stonnington, two current development applications across Prahran and South Yarra represent the next sling of smaller sized towers for the municipality. A 14 storey apartment building at 10-16 Cecil Place is being sought by Bensons Property Group.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Tuesday, January 17, 2017 - 00:00
On 2 January 2017, it was reported that several popular eateries and bars in Footscray had been vandalised, including the perennially successful 8 Bit Burgers on Droop Street, and Up In Smoke on Hopkins Street. 8 Bit had the warm new year's welcome gift of 14 smashed windows and the words “F**k off hipster scum” spray-painted on their entrance.

Visual Melbourne

Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - 17:00
Melbourne’s architectural landscape is a wonderful juxtaposition of modern and Victorian architecture. Although the CBD has been peppered with many skyscrapers, its historical structures have won Melbourne the title of “Australia’s most European city”.

Advertisement

Transport & Design

Monday, February 20, 2017 - 12:00
The Minister for Public Transport, Jacinta Allan, this morning announced the preferred design option for removing level crossings in Cheltenham and Mentone would include sinking the rail lines under existing road grades and rebuilding both stations in respective trenches. The level crossings on Frankston line to go are Park Road and Charman Road in Cheltenham and Balcombe Road in Mentone.

Sustainability & Environment

Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 08:00
There has been a noticeable shift towards providing quality green public amenity in major cities, leading to more resilient cities which are capable of addressing future challenges such as population growth, increased density, climate change and the desire for more communal recreational spaces.