Give the road under rail grade separation at Buckley Street a chance


Sub-optimal outcomes, perceived or otherwise, were always going to be included in the wider level crossing removal project, and Buckley Street in Essendon just so happens to be one of them.

In 2015, Urban Melbourne took a look at the Moonee Valley-led council proposal to remove the level crossing at Buckley Street and apply a new structure plan to Essendon.  

To this day, the notion of removing the existing rail-over-road bridge at Mount Alexander Road and sinking the whole rail corridor under both a restored Mount Alexander Road and Buckley street appears to be the best case scenario.

However, if we take a look at it with fresh eyes after seeing the process of rolling out other level crossing removal projects, the gloss starts to wither away.

For starters as one commenter made mention in the original article, the originally predicted price tag of near $200 million would eat away into the overall budget and take funds away from completing another removal project in metro Melbourne.

Disruption would be huge and quite frankly unacceptable - removing an already grade-separated crossing, filling in the void created over a century ago and then digging another wide trench to fit a 3 platform station - is both profligate and would put the Craigieburn (and Seymour) lines out of action for months.  

Absolutely yes, if a rail line were to be taken out action for that amount of time, it would make sense to do other level crossings - Glenroy is also on the list - but budget for doing other local crossings like Park St and Puckle Street/Holmes Road in Moonee Ponds needs to come from somewhere.

The urban outcomes of the council-led plan tick a lot of boxes - better integration between rail and tram services, and they correct the wanton waste of land that is the Essendon station car park by developing on top of it as well as the sunken rail corridor - but it all comes down to disruption and budget.

One sledge against the preferred option for removing the Buckley Street level crossing is that it is a cheap solution.  Which in and of itself is interesting.  The detailed render in the lead image above depicts a far better urban realm than what currently exists at Buckley Street.

Employing Urban Designers does not come cheap and there's clearly been a lot of thought put it into the pedestrian realm.  In fact it's a massive upgrade over the current dominance of a 4 lane road choked with cars - never forget that, a level crossing is always the worst outcome, everything else is always better.

Whether this is an optimal or sub-optimal outcome, the land around Essendon station is changing and the station will solidify itself as the centre of the suburb soon enough - see the list of projects below.


Dean's picture

It never ceases to amaze me how ridiculous people can be. There's undoubted community support to grade separate Buckley Street and the rail line. Then when plans are announced to do just that, people complain because it's not exactly the way they wanted it done, with little or no regard to the costs involved since we have only a finite amount of money available or to the heritage of the old station itself.

First world problems. Get over it.

Back to top
Rick Clarke's picture

It doesn't appear that GHD's figure of $183 million is inclusive of the cost of running replacement bus services during the construction period. I understand the Council's plan is slated to take a year or more for construction, and due to lack of an alternate turn back between North Melbourne and Broadmeadows, most of the train line would need to be closed. Any one have any idea how much that would cost?

Back to top
George D's picture

Dean that's because there's no cost to those opposing this.

The expensive and technically difficult option is chosen: the Govt loses, other people pay.
The recommended option is chosen: local opposition means the Govt loses.
The crossing is not installed: local disappointment means the Govt loses.

In every case, the opposition gets something for free. Especially as their enablers in the credulous media will give them the coverage they desire.

Back to top

Development & Planning

Friday, March 23, 2018 - 12:00
As indicated in Urban Melbourne's article on commercial development , site works have commenced on the Two Melbourne Quarter site, which forms part of the greater Melbourne Quarter development being delivered by Lendlease within the Docklands precinct. This has coincided with Lendlease securing EnergyAustralia as the anchor tenant for Two Melbourne Quarter and signing a development agreement to commence construction in earnest.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Sunday, March 11, 2018 - 13:00
The Victorian Government has announced it will ban the use of aluminium cladding panels that have a polyethylene core of more than 30% and expanded polystyrene will also be banned on buildings with 3 or more levels. The changes were announced by the Planning Minister, Richard Wynne, on Saturday morning along with new guidelines for building surveyors.

Visual Melbourne

Monday, February 5, 2018 - 12:00
The various spaces and elements which combine to form RMIT's New Academic Street (NAS) have progressively begun to open to students and visitors alike. I was recently fortunate enough to be part of an informal group tour through the completed spaces within NAS, led by Harrison and White which had a hand in the project.

Transport & Design

Sustainability & Environment