The year that was 2014

The lead image says it all really. CBD-based aerial photography firm Lenasoft captured Melbourne at its magnificent best, with no shortage of cranes visible. In a year like no other relating to development, we've witnessed an ever increasing batch of highly impressive projects come into the pipeline, while the overall construction scene has never been busier.

Opinions will vary tremendously, but this is Urban Melbourne's the good, the bad and the ugly for 2014.

The Good

The continued influx of Asian developers has bought on a different design dynamic throughout 2014. With comparatively grander intentions than domestic developers and with the financial backing to match, some exceptional proposals have been put forward and approved in the course of this year. If development is to occur, it should be of the highest possible design quality and our perception is there's no shortage at the moment; 380 Lonsdale Street nudging out all others as our favourite design for 2014.

In a market sense, Melbourne just keeps going! Perhaps it is a sign of the underlying strength of the residential sector, but I can't think of an apartment project during 2014 that failed to materialise once sales had begun; there'd be a handful out there no doubt. Elsewhere commercial, retail and particularly institutional development has fired throughout the year. Has the development cycle flattened out to be perpetually busy in a sign of Melbourne's increasing population and overall maturity?

The bad

Is there an ongoing, subtle erosion of Melbourne's heritage character? Yes.

I'm not necessarily referring to headline firestorms such as The Palace on Bourke Street, but the smaller projects that only garner comment on websites and forums dedicated to such matters. 36-40 La Trobe Street and 137 Bourke Street have been demolished while 488-494 La Trobe Street looks to be going the same way. Is facadism better than nothing? Have City of Melbourne and state authorities implemented adequate heritage controls?

No doubt buyers in Tower Melbourne would be ill at ease after the marquee project has been in hiatus for 2014, as two rival developers have been mired down in legal wrangling regarding adjoining developments. A bad outcome all round!

On a micro level, we've had more than enough individual correspondence this year involving the average domestic buyer (such as you or I) - in the position of finding the best apartments within a given project - have been snapped up either by channel investors or overseas buyers. As always opportunity will arise and the market will address this by innovative means, look no further than Apartment Register.

The ugly

The two-horse race will continue into 2015, but there's no doubt the two ugliest affairs of 2014 were The Palace saga and East West Link.

The Palace involved a fourth planning application for the site this year, belated height controls for the precinct, public discontent, the removal of what many consider to be treasured interiors of the venue; Benny Hill show, anyone? While so many planning applications delivered excellent outcomes over the course of the year, The Palace leaves a sour taste in the mouth in so much that it's the pin-up for what happens when developers with intent meet with lackluster planning controls. Everything has gone wrong!

The key to East West Link is also mass (and I emphasize mass) public discontent, for it doesn't occur all that often. From protests early in the year to the tearing up of contracts, it's never been far from the headlines.

The advancement of the city's infrastructure which will cater for our booming population is of paramount importance; no politics thanks although unfortunately one feels both are intrinsically entwined. How much of a financial and infrastructure blunder the East West Link will be seen as will only become apparent during 2015, when the build consortium is remunerated and more importantly how quickly and to which replacement infrastructure projects will funding flow to.

Thanks to those who matter

After a long year, we've forged ahead thanks to the hard work and dedication of a select group of people (you know who you are) and the ever present support from many, many industry participants as well.

With all said and done for 2014, we wish all our readers a relaxing and fulfilling festive period. Urban Melbourne will see you again - and be back to our normal publishing regime - on Monday January 12th 2015.


Peter Maltezos's picture

Excellent summary! yes

Thankyou Mark.

I collect, therefore I am.

Back to top
Adrian's picture

Great article Mark.

Well done and thanks for all your work along with all the other contributors making this one of the best information & discussion websites out there. Melbourne is lucky to have it.

I'm surprised at your nomination of 380 Lonsdale St as best design though ! Not that I necessarily disagree but what was your thinking behind that ? If it's for returning a new laneway to Melbourne to help replace the others and the heritage we've lost - then I wholeheartedly concur.

Back to top
Mark Baljak's picture

Thanks gents

Epic street level design Adrian - that's where Melbourne's unique character can be maintained and furthered if development is guided along excellence at street level.

Just picked up about 10 new planning apps - some tall timber amongst them. Will be an interesting new year on the website.

Back to top
Bilby's picture

Well done on another year of ever interesting reading, analysis and debate about Melbourne's future, Mark - looking forward to 2015!

Back to top
Adrian's picture

Excellent look forward to reading about them and yes agreed re: 380 Lonsdale St.

In the meantime enjoy a well deserved Christmas and New Years break !

Back to top
Riccardo's picture

I notice when I read this website practically all the contributions are from males. Any reason?

Back to top
Alastair Taylor's picture

The overwhelming majority of our content (80-85%) is planned & created by the same people who own and operate the site - Mark, Laurence and myself - and we just happen to be male.

Back to top

Development & Planning

Monday, December 11, 2017 - 00:00
More than 8,000 square metres of land in Wheelers Hill has been given the development green light by Monash City Council. At the turn of December Council chose to endorse an application to develop vacant land at 161-169 Jells Road for a multi-level aged care facility.

Policy, Culture & Opinion

Monday, November 20, 2017 - 12:00
The marriage of old and new can be a difficult process, particularly when the existing structure has intrinsic heritage value. In previous times Fitzroy's 237 Napier Street served as the home of furniture manufacturer C.F. Rojo and Sons. Taking root during 1887, Christobel Rojo oversaw operations though over time the site would become home to furniture manufacturer Thonet.

Visual Melbourne

Friday, August 25, 2017 - 07:00
The former site of John Batman's home, Batman's Hill is entering the final stages of its redevelopment. Collins Square's final tower has begun its skyward ascent, as has Lendlease's Melbourne Quarter Commercial and Residential precinct already. Melbourne Quarter's first stage is at construction and involves a new 12-storey home for consultancy firm Arup along with a skypark.


Transport & Design

Saturday, December 9, 2017 - 00:00
Spring Street has released details of a large shutdown of the Pakenham/Cranbourne and Frankston lines which will allow workers to complete major upgrades to the rail infrastructure. The work is required to allow for the introduction of the new High Capacity Metro Trains (HCMTs) and will involve upgrading power & catenary, signalling and communications equipment in the Dandenong (Pakenham/Cranbourne) corridor.

Sustainability & Environment

Tuesday, October 24, 2017 - 12:00
Cbus Property's office development for Medibank at 720 Bourke Street in Docklands recently became the first Australian existing property to receive a WELL Certification, Gold Shell and Core rating. The WELL rating goes beyond sustainable building features with a greater focus on the health and well-being of a building's occupants.